Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare the temperature dependence of a scintillation survey meter with and without the temperature compensation function. Investigation of temperature dependence is important to make precise measurements in various environments. Method: The experiment was conducted using the NaI (Tl) scintillation survey meter with the temperature compensation function (TCS-1172) and the NaI (Tl) and CsI (Tl) scintillation survey meters without the temperature compensation function (TCS-171, PDR-111). In all, 1 cm dose equivalent rate (µSv/h) was measured by changing the room temperature from 10 to 40 degree Celsius. Result: The results showed that the scintillation survey meter with the temperature compensation function had almost no change in the measured values with changes in room temperature, whereas the 1 cm dose equivalent rate of the scintillation survey meter without the temperature compensation function changed by a maximum of −7.2 (%/10°C) as temperature increased. Conclusion: This study confirms that the scintillation survey meter with the temperature compensation function was less dependent on temperature, and stable measurement was possible. However, it was suggested that the scintillation survey meter without the temperature compensation function might cause a drop in the measured value as the temperature rises.

Increased occupational exposure of radiation workers is a major problem during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the hip joint, as the surgeon’s eye lens is in close proximity to the patient and the X-ray tube. The purposes of this study were to clarify the occupational exposure of radiation workers during ORIF of the hip joint and to examine the need for radiation protection measures. The radiation exposure of radiation workers was evaluated by making an airborne dose distribution map using phantom experiments. The radiation goggles attached with a small optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter were used in clinical practice to measure the lens dose received by the surgeon, and the necessity of radiation goggles was examined. The airborne dose distribution in ORIF of the hip joint showed a wider area of high dose rate during axial fluoroscopy of the femoral neck than during posterior–anterior fluoroscopy. In axial fluoroscopy of the femoral neck, the surgeon was always in the high dose rate range of 10 µGy/min or higher, the nurses were in the dose rate range of 4 to 10 µGy/min, and the radiologic technologists were in the dose rate range of 0.5 µGy/min or lower. The maximum 3 mm dose equivalent to the surgeon per case was 0.38 mSv. In contradiction, radiation goggles were useful in ORIF because they provided approximately 60% shielding. It is advisable to work with radiation goggles to avoid cataracts.

Purpose: In recent years, there has been a growing movement in Western countries toward the abolition of gonadal protection during radiography. The reasons for this recommendation are that there are few reports of increased risk of genetic effects, that the ovarian dose is not due to direct X-rays but due to internally scattered X-rays that cannot be shielded, and that the presence of gonadal protection may adversely affect the automatic exposure control mechanism and may mask important findings. In addition, the gonadal protection is a large high absorber of X-rays, and its presence in the irradiation field may have some effect on image quality, but the effect of the gonadal protection on image quality has not been clarified. In addition, after the abolition of gonadal protection, the optimal irradiation field setting is expected to become even more important to avoid unnecessary exposure. In this study, we investigated the effect of gonadal protection on image quality in frontal hip radiographs of adults with different radiation qualities and clarified the image quality under conditions in which the irradiation field is appropriately narrowed. Method: Frontal hip radiographs were taken using a human phantom as the subject, and the image quality of the femoral head was evaluated. Two irradiation fields were used: (a) 14×17 inch field and (b) an appropriate field (11.6×15 inch) that does not impair the reference line and image information necessary for reading hip joint images. The imaging tube voltage was set at 70 kV, and conditions for adding a copper filter were also considered. The incident surface air kerma was set to 1.25 mGy. The incident surface dose at this time was sufficiently lower than the diagnostic reference level (2.5 mGy) in Japan and was judged to be appropriate for imaging using an indirect conversion flat panel detector. The image quality evaluation item was the signal difference to noise ratio (SdNR) including scatterers. Result: The SdNR decreased by 4.6% when a gonadal shield was placed, indicating that the gonadal shield reduced image quality. When the irradiation field size was appropriately narrowed down, SdNR slightly increased or decreased depending on the quality of the imaging material, but the change was small compared to the change in SdNR with and without the gonadal protection shield. Conclusion: The results of this study confirm that the elimination of gonadal protection in hip radiography has significant advantages, such as reducing unnecessary X-ray exposure while ensuring image quality, when the irradiation field is set appropriately.

Purpose: Incidents are recommended to be analyzed by root cause analysis (RCA). Our institution also conducts RCA for incidents and takes measures to prevent recurrence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of countermeasures against the root causes analyzed by RCA in order to prevent recurrence of incidents. Methods: Since the treatment planning CT scanner was replaced, incidents of failure to zero adjustment the coordinates of the bed position occurred four times during a three-month period. The RCA was used to investigate the root causes of these incidents and to formulate measures to prevent recurrence. To evaluate the effectiveness of the recurrence prevention measures, we collected the number of recurrence of incidents during the first year after the effectiveness of the recurrence prevention measures, and used the chi-square test to determine the significant difference in the probability of an incident occurring at a significance level of 5% or less. Results: The measures to prevent the recurrence of incidents were to double-check that the coordinates of the bed position were adjusted to zero and to simulate operations based on a work flow that incorporated this double-check. During the first year period following the implementation of these recurrence prevention measures, the number of recurrence incidents was zero, and the probability of their occurrence decreased statistically significantly (p<0.05). Conclusion: Thorough double-checks and work simulation based on the work flow are effective methods for preventing the recurrence of incidents.