The capitalistic economy has brought regional concentration of economic activities. The degree of the concentration is called “REGIONAL DIFFERENTIAL”.
This report is focused on industrial activities. Therefore, we call the concentration “INDUSTRIAL REGIONAL DIFFERENTIAL (I.R.D.)”.
I.R.D. influences the residents' life directly or indirectly. To survey it is the basis for regional development and planning as well as industrial growth. Besides, this report refers to applied geography.
The method of this study is analyzed by the author's formula of No.I∼III and No.a∼f, and its index is the number of factories, employees, output-value and local government's dimensions (prefecture, city, town and village).
To begin with, the author calculated the coefficient of concentration of factory, employee, and the regional productivity in 1935, 1945, 1962 of all prefectures by the No.I∼III. Its results were shown to the graph (Fig. 5). According to the graph, the prefectures on Pacific Ocean revealed notable concentration, but in the prefectures on Sea of Japan this was little recognized. For West Japan the degree of concentration is high in the prefectures on Seto Inland Sea, and it is low in the other prefectures. On this basis we made a trial of regional devisions with the coefficient of factory concentration of manufacturing activities in 1962 (Fig. 3).
Besides the author limited consideration to four zones by the configuration of West Japan and considered the I.R.D.. The configurational boundaries are Chugoku Mts., Seto Inland Sea, Izumi Mts., Shikoku Mts. and Kyusyu Mts..
The inside zones are two places along Seto Inland Sea and the degree of concentration is high. Particularly its northern zone (Sanyo, Northern Kyusyu districts) are marked with concentration. On the other hand, the outside zones are two prefectures of the north district of Chugoku Mts. and south of Izumi Mts., Shikoku Mts. and Kyusyu Mts. (Wakayama, Tokushima, Kochi, Miyazaki and Kagoshima prefectures), and the coefficient of concentration is low.
The next analysis is calculated by No.a∼c in regard to 1, 470 local governments (city, town, village) area, with established manufacturing areas and classification of it by regional productivity. In the results West Japan included 79 manufacturing areas on 1962 (Table 2). And the classification is leveled at a coefficient of over 30.0 (8), 20.0∼29.9 (9), 10.0∼19.9 (13), 5.0∼9.9 (13), 0.0∼4.9 (36).……() number of manufacturing area.
Then the manufacturing area included the city as “CORE”. Therefore, we took industrial structure of cities and manufacturing areas by No.d∼f, chiefly from the point of view of factory and labor productivities. On that occasion 79 manufacturing areas were divided into the five types. Namely, (1) A group (two coefficients of productivity over 20.0), (2) B group (both 10.0∼20.0), (3) C group (factory productivity 2.5∼10.0, labor productivity -2.5∼2.5 or the former 0.0∼10.0, the latter 2.5∼10.0), (4) D group (both -2.5∼2.5), (5) Egroup (both under -2.5). (Fig. 9)
Table 5 synthesized the results of the above. In short West Japan included 79 manufacturing areas, and its I.R.D. was explained clearly.
Particularly the Northern zone of the Inside area continues to be the highest marine manufacturing area, but on the outside there is a tendency to sectional concentration.
抄録全体を表示