Three hundred and eighty three strains of streptococci were isolated from both patients and carriers in Chiang Mai, Thailand from 1985 to 1986. The strains were serologically identified by grouping, T-typing and M-typing and tested by Opacity Factor (OF) test. Immunization tests were also carried out with isolated strains.
The results were as follows:
1) Of the isolated strains, 74.9% were determined to be group A streptococci; 15.4% were group G; 6.3% were group C; and 3.4 % were group B. Prevalent T-types of group A streptococci were [14, 49], [3, 13, B3264], and there were 16 NT (non-typeable) strains (5.6%) and 83 (28.9%) T-complex types of strains, whose combinations have not yet been published. These results were quite different from the prevalent groups and types of streptococcus found in Japan.
2) A total of 76 out of 287 strains (26.5%) of group A streptococci were M-typeable with classical M-typing sera available in our laboratory. Specifically, the M-types of strains were M49, M44, M11, Ml and M60.
3) OF test of the isolated strains were undertaken with HC1 extracts, and some of the results did not completely correspond to T-types already confirmed by other investigators.
4) By immunization test, typing sera of T-Thai 15, T-Thai 16, M-Thai 15 and M-Thai 16 could successfully be prepared. Using M-typing sera, including the newly-prepared antisera against the isolated strains, M-typeability of all strains was slightly increased to 31.0%.
5) Many discrepancies were observed between the results of T-typing and M-typing, such as those of the Thai 15 strain, which was finally typed as T-Thai 15, M-Thai 15, but was originally typed as T23, M44. Some of the strains typed as M49 were originally typed as Imp. 19 by T-typing method, and there were many other cases of discrepancy.
From these results, we can see that it is important to pay attention to the appraisal of T-typing results of strains isolated in Asian countries, where streptococcus prevalences have not yet been clearly understood.
View full abstract