Endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic sinusitis leaves pathological mucosa at maxillary sinus, frontal sinus and sphenoid sinus, and therefore it is interesting to observe how diseased mucosa of pathological sinus takes its healing process after surgery. Outcome of operation was good in some cases even thought they were in severe condition during surgery, while it was poor in some cases even though their condition was not very severe. Therefore, there should be some factors which affect post-surgery healing process other than severity of the disease. We examined maxillary sinus to find out if post-surgery improvement level is related to endoscopic findings and/or pathological findings.
By collecting maxillary sinus mucosa, we examined healing process of chronic sinusitis of cases who underwent endoscopic surgery for the first time. After one year, we examined the condition of the maxillary sinus based on endoscopic findings and classified it into “cured, ” “good, ” “fair” and “poor.” Cured and good were considered as satisfactory healing. We also studied relationship between endoscopic findings and improvement, and between pathological findings and improvement. Then we compared improvement by age, whether sinusitis is unilateral or bilateral, and the presence/absence of nasal allergy or asthma.
There were a total of 122 cases (N=216), their age ranged from 10 to 78 years, they were 89 males and 33 females, and their disease was bilateral in 94 cases (N=188) and unilateral in 28 cases (N=28). Eighteen cases had nasal allergy (N=33), 16 cases had asthma (N=31 ; 4 cases had also nasal allergy but included in the asthma group), and 88 cases had no these complications.
We classified maxillary sinus findings by thickness of mucosa and contents of sinus. Mucosal thickness was classified into mild, moderate and severe. Maxillary cavity findings were classified by contents into (1) none, (2) polyps, (3) cysts and (4) fluids (such as mucosal secretion and pus). Light microscopic findings of edema, fibrosis and cellular infiltration were rated by 3 grades, and their improvement was compared. Cellular infiltration was further classified into mononuclear cell-dominant one and eosinophil-dominant one. The improvement rate (percentage of “cured” + “good” cases) in all patients was 82. 9%, while “fair” and “poor” were observed in 14.3% and 2.8%, respectively. The improvement rate was 92.9% and 79.3% in case with unilateral and bilateral sinusitis, respectively. This rate was 97.0% in cases with nasal allergy and 48.4% in cases with asthma. Overall improvement level of cases with nasal allergy was satisfactory even when compared with no complications. On the other hand, cases with asthma showed poor improvement. when the level of thickness of maxillary mucosa was compared, the improvement rate in cases with mild thickness was excellent (98.7%). The improvement rate was 78.9% and 75.0% in cases with moderate and severe thickness, respectively. When the improvement rate was compared as a function of the contents of the maxillary cavity, it was excellent in cases with no contents (95.1%), and the rate was 89.0%, 82.0%, and 68.0% in cases with fluids, cysts and polyps, respectively. The result was the poorest in cases with polyps.
Regarding light microscopic findings, the severity of edema, fibrosis, infectious cells and infiltration had no relationship with the outcome of the disease. However, the improvement rate was poorer in cases showing eosinophil-dominant infiltration than cases showing mononuclear cell-dominant infiltratoin. Eosinophil dominance was seen in many cases complicated by asthma. There was no significant difference in the improvement rate between cases with nasal allergy and those without it. Even in cases without asthma, the improvement rate was poor when they had eosinophil-dominant infiltration.
The above results
View full abstract