All issues
Volume 29 (1978 - 197･･･
- Issue 4 Pages 2-
- Issue 3 Pages 2-
- Issue 2 Pages 2-
- Issue 1 Pages 2-
Volume 29, Issue 1
Displaying 1-15 of 15 articles from this issue
- |<
- <
- 1
- >
- >|
-
[in Japanese]1978 Volume 29 Issue 1 Pages 2-10
Published: July 31, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: October 20, 2009
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (1408K) -
[in Japanese]1978 Volume 29 Issue 1 Pages 11-23
Published: July 31, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: October 20, 2009
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (1568K) -
1978 Volume 29 Issue 1 Pages 23b
Published: 1978
Released on J-STAGE: February 05, 2010
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (86K) -
1978 Volume 29 Issue 1 Pages 23a
Published: 1978
Released on J-STAGE: February 05, 2010
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (86K) -
[in Japanese]1978 Volume 29 Issue 1 Pages 24-34
Published: July 31, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: October 20, 2009
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (1460K) -
Takayosi Naitou1978 Volume 29 Issue 1 Pages 35-49
Published: July 31, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: October 20, 2009
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSThe study of social stratification contains the standard of distribution, the distribution of resource and member. In this paper the writer attempts to consider some problems concerning the principles of member distribution in social stratification.
Hitherto, there were ascribed status and achieved status in R. Linton, ascription and achievement in T. Parsons' pattern variable as their principles. Historically the conception of competition was an essential principle of social structure in modern society. In sociology formal sociology had studied competition as an important social relationship, but in contemporary sociology it hardly has been considered.
Recently social mobility has been studied as the principle of member distribution in social stratification. The amount and nature of social mobility indicate us a great deal about social stratification. Also it is an important element in understanding structure formation, but fundamentally competition is a social relationship different from social mobility. Inter-generational social mobility is the relationship between father's social status and the son's status, but competition is the relative relationship with others in the position on social stratification. The difference is important, when we analyze their function in personality system, social system and culture system. I comprehend and emphasize competition as the inner process of social structure and the principle of member distribution in social stratification.View full abstractDownload PDF (2277K) -
Takashi Harada1978 Volume 29 Issue 1 Pages 50-66
Published: July 31, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: February 05, 2010
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSThe changes of family types for the period of 15 years 1960-75 roughly covering that of rapid growth of economy were put to macro-analysis of the statistical data (chiefly Population Census data). It is essentially useful for examining the supporting type and also the human relations of old people in the homes.
During the 15 years the distribution ratio by family types recorded the most drastic change which we had ever seen. In this connection the following characteristics can be pointed out.
(a) While nuclear family households have rapidly increased, extended family households remain almost unchanged. The latter is said to have actually increased, when it is taken into consideration that the number of extended family households statistically comes out much smaller than the number of extended families especially in recent years.
It is because economic development has caused an increase in such cases of staying away from home as being employed in a far locality, sent out on business trip, for more than 3 months, or transferred to local agencies for few years. And as result, many extended families were surveyed as two or more separated small households, though they were sharing household economy.
A number of consciousness researches made it clear ideologically that either old people or children mostly would like to live in the extended families. This results in a high rate of 74.2% of the number of those 65 years old and over who are living in the relatives households (excluding households of one married couple) per total old peoples 65 years old and over.
Thus nuclear family households increased to a remarkable degree with neither disorganization of extended families nor alternation of ideology. The increase was due to population of youngsters in marriageable age which was much greater in these 15 years than the population in the past. Accordingly, the increase of nuclear family households in Japan is not real nucleating pattern which is commonly perceived in U.S.A. and other countries.
The rate of nuclear family households to the total relatives households has rapidly risen, but the rate apparently cannot be other than fictitious.View full abstractDownload PDF (2512K) -
A fundamental categories of structural analysis on the wage-labourNoritsugu Koga1978 Volume 29 Issue 1 Pages 67-72
Published: July 31, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: May 07, 2010
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSThe modern labour defined by the mode of “Capitalism” requires the existence of labour-force which is free and independent of others, but the most important matter is impossible to divide it from its owner. Therefore, we must study not only the material relations of “capital-labour-force” but also the personal relations of “capitalist-labourer”.
The former implies labour-force and means of production where capital transforms, the latter implies class problems, composed the relation of “capitalist class-working class”, labour movement, and the hierarchic structure defined by the difference of the quality of labour-force. From this point of view, the matter is the growth of two classes from “an sich” to “fürsich” produced by the training of labour-force and trade union. And, that structure inside the working class is reproduced through generations. By this thing on the labour-market, capital can maintain its usual production. It is an approach that regards the heterogeneity or difference rather than homogeneity or similarity in our society.
Now, it is “labour-relations” implying wage, working-hours, and labourer-management that combines material-personal double relations in “wage-labour”. It combines production processes and life processes and defines the reproduction of labour-force.
Social theory of labour is composed as theory of labour-relations which considers labour as relations of person-person and person-nature, but the aim of this paper is to discuss the fundamental categories in the research on “wage-labour”.View full abstractDownload PDF (1058K) -
[in Japanese]1978 Volume 29 Issue 1 Pages 73-76
Published: July 31, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: October 20, 2009
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (634K) -
[in Japanese]1978 Volume 29 Issue 1 Pages 76-79
Published: July 31, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: October 20, 2009
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (573K) -
[in Japanese]1978 Volume 29 Issue 1 Pages 79-82
Published: July 31, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: October 20, 2009
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (444K) -
[in Japanese], [in Japanese]1978 Volume 29 Issue 1 Pages 83-86
Published: July 31, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: October 20, 2009
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (545K) -
[in Japanese]1978 Volume 29 Issue 1 Pages 86-89
Published: July 31, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: October 20, 2009
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (538K) -
[in Japanese]1978 Volume 29 Issue 1 Pages 89-92
Published: July 31, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: October 20, 2009
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (648K) -
[in Japanese]1978 Volume 29 Issue 1 Pages 93-97
Published: July 31, 1978
Released on J-STAGE: October 20, 2009
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (665K)
- |<
- <
- 1
- >
- >|