In our previous report10) we made it clear that water vapor contained in air greatly influenced the wet-bulb temperatures of organic solvents. Based on the idea that one might obtain higher rate of vaporization by using water-wet air rather than dry air, our Studies were coptinued with a view to throwing light on how the vaporization of organic solvents into water-wet air would be affected by water-vapor content thereof.
The present results obtained with toluene, ethyl-alcohol and methyl-alcohol clearly proved that we were right in supposing that water-wet air would bring about higher rate of vaporization than dry air, as shown in Figs. 3 & 4. Here the curves for methyl-alcohol are omitted in order to avoid complication.
I. Effects of Temperature of Air and Its Water-vapor Content upon ht:
(i) In Dry Air:
The surface temperatures of liquids in the vaporization pan were calculated by means of Eq. (5), derived from Eq. (1) and Mizushina & Nakajima's Eq. (4)5), which is said to be applicable over the region where Sc, Pr=0.5-2.5. The results tabulated in Table 1 show that these surface temperatures are 1-2°C lower than the wet bulb temperatures of the same organic solvents, which we measured in our previous experiments10)-Cf. Fig. 5-(A), (B) & (C). Of these two kinds, the lower temperatures seem to be the real surface temperatures, uninfluenced by radiation heat, etc. The values of hs, calculated by using Eq. (6), are plotted in Fig. 6.
(ii) In Water-wet Air:
In Table 3 are shown the surface temperatures (t
a1) calculated by using Eq. (8), where hs is the value obtained from Eq. (6) and where the absorption heat etc. are ignored because they are negligibly small as compared with condensing heat. Here again the surface temperatures (t
a1) are almost 1-3°C lower than the wet bulb temperatures. hr can be obtained from Eq. (9). These data are plotted in Fig. 6 as h
t=h
s+h
r vs. dry bulb temperatures of air. The values of hr are known to be considerably larger than those of hs.
II. Effects of Air Velocity upon ht:
The experimental data are plotted in Fig. 7 and correlated as shown in Figs. 8 & 9, by means of dimensional group in Eqs. (17) & (18); b2 and n appearing in these are shown in Table 4, too. ε in the equations is a factor to show the effect of water-vapor content of air upon the vaporization of organic solvents and is equal to 1 when the experiment is conducted in dry air. The powers of Reynolds number in these equations agree with the results obtained by other workers1, 2, 6, 8). The power of Prandtl number is what Mizushina and Nakajima5) proposed in their report. The valueS of n. which are the power of ε, seem to agree with values represented by the slopes of linear lines in the diagrams obtained formerly by us10). These lines show the relation between the wet-bulb depression of organic liquids (t-t
a1) and the wet-bulb depression of water (t-t
w1)-Cf. Fig. 5 (A), (B) & (C).
抄録全体を表示