The present study examined postoperative impairment following intrathoracic uppermediastinal mechanical anastomosis which was introduced in December 1991 to sequelae such as stenosis or dysphagia following surgery on esophageal carcinoma. Findings were compared with various types of manually sutured cervical anastomoses previously employed, and surgical techniques were assessed in view of these findings. The sujects of the study comprised 14 cases of Gambee 1-layer anastomosis (G1-layer method), 17 cases of stratified 2-layer anastomosis using interrupted sutures (2-layer interrupted method), and 26 cases of stratified 2-layer anastomosis using continuous sutures (2-layer continuous method), 26 cases of mechanically sutured intrathoracic uppermediastinal anastomosis, for a total of 83 subjects. The followings were investigated : (1) Day oral alimentation commenced. (2) Onset of suture insufficiency. (3) Incidence of suture insufficiency. (4) Incidence of postoperative stenosis. (5) Incidence of postoperative dysphagia.
The interval before the resumption of ordinary meals was 2-3 weeks in subjects with various types of cervical anastomosis, compared with the significantly shorter interval of approximately 10 days in subjects with mechanical anastomosis. The onset of suture insufficiency was delayed in the G 1 -layer method group, 2-layer interrupted suture group, and 2-layer continuous suture group, in that order. The incidence of suture insufficiency, incidence of postoperative stenosis, and incidence of postoperative dysphagia decreased in the following order : G1-layer method, 2 -layer interrupted suture method, 2-layer continuous method, and mechanical suture method. Thus, these data indicated that from the perspective of postoperative impairment, mechanical anastomosis constitutes a superior reconstruction technique following surgery for esophageal carcinoma compared to various types of manually stutured cervical anastomoses.
View full abstract