Objective : To find out whether patients undergoing repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) could have better long-term survival rates than those listed for elective resection.
Design : Retrospective study
Setting : Teaching hospital, Juntendo Izunagaoka
Materials and methods : The medical records of 100 patients who underwent repair of AAA between May 1990 to January 1999 were reviewed. The data were examined for the following factors : age, sex, symptoms, size of the AAA at the first outpatient clinic, size of the AAA at surgery, interval between first outpatient clinic and surgery, blood pressure, cardiac function (ejection fraction), coronary risk factor, coronary artery disease, preoperative and postoperative laboratory data, hemodynamics at operation, duration of operation, duration of aortic cross clamping, and size of the implanted graft. Univariate analysis was performed with Student's t test and X
2 test. Survival curves were constructed using Kaplan-Meier analysis for the patients from the ruptured AAA and elective AAA groups who survived more than 30 days after surgery.
Results : No statistical differences were found between the two groups in regard to the following factors : age, the initial diameter of AAA, interval to operation, preoperative blood pressure, the duration of operation, the duration of aortic cross clamping, the diameter of the graft, postoperative hospitalization. In a comparison of group I and group II, statistically significant differences were found in the following variables : the diameter of the AAAs at operation (p=0.004), symptoms (p=0.0001), preoperative hemodynamic deterioration (an SBP of 80mmHg or less of more than 30 minutes' duration (p=0.0018), chronic renal insufficiency (Cr>1.5
mg/dl) (p=0.0001).
The overall mortality rate was 24% (24/100). Ten of the deaths were operative deaths and 4 were intraoperative deaths, and were excluded from survival analysis. Cumulative survival rates of the patients of the ruptured group were 81.3%, 71.1% and 71.1% at 1, 3, and 5 years after AAA surgery, respectively, and those of the non-ruptured group patients were 86.2%, 81.9%, 76.0%, and 76.0% at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years after AAA surgery, respectively. In a comparison of the patients who underwent emergency repair for ruptured AAA with those who underwent elective surgery for non-ruptured AAA, no statistically significant differences were found in the cumulative survival.
Conclusion : In patients surviving surgery for ruptured aortic aneurysms, their life expectancy will parallel that achieved by patients undergoing elective surgery.
View full abstract