Objective : To ascertain the relationship between administrators' attributes, attitudes and lifestyles, and supportive environmental indicators of health policy and satisfaction with the process of policy-making at the local levels.
Materials and Methods : Researchers conducted a survey by mail, targeting health policy administrators in 509 municipalities in the Kanto district, Japan. The study respondents were asked about the presence of specific factors, current analytical factors and decision-making factors related to issues and subjects, how policy is formed, indicators in the policy, their satisfaction with the process of policy-making, and their beliefs and conditions. Among these populations, 274 persons (60.2% of responders) responded; 143 respondents answered questions about satisfaction and 149 answered questions about the supportive environmental indicators. Relations were analyzed using x
2 test. Logistic regression analysis was implemented to consider the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval.
Results : Logistic regression analysis showed that supportive environments were characterized by obtaining other sections' policies related to health, coordination inside the agency, and being able to talk extensively with colleagues. Satisfaction about the process of making health policy was related to the administrators' subjective health, exchange among other municipalities, and ability to attend to business spontaneously. Opinions about health policy and epidemiology were connected with satisfaction and supportive environmental indicators, and in contrast, the absence of neighboring communities as one of the settings for health and not providing meals as a health promotion policy, with supportive environmental indicators and satisfaction affected their beliefs and conditions. Involving the staff in other sections as participants in policy making was an important factor within the indicators.
Conclusions : This study suggested that making contact with other sections inside an agency and with other municipalities outside, formally and informally, not only promotes administrators' satisfaction but also establishes supportive environments providing city information. Paradoxically, respondents expressed very specific ideas about what should count as health promotion. For instance, they are interested in supportive environments for health, not in providing meals as potential health promotion, nor neighboring communities as one of the settings for health, although they are providers of health services. Therefore, researchers should investigate the actual situation focusing on these inconsistencies.
View full abstract