By analyzing the data from actual screening work performed by our group, we have given some considerations to perform mass screening for both tuberculosis and lung cancer more efficiently. The results were as follows
1. On the basis of radiophotography, the detailed examinations were considered necessary in 5, 612 subjects, which were 1.52% of the 363, 608 screened.
2. Detection of Tuberculosis
The detailed examination or direct radiography revealed that only 83 subjects had tuberculosis which was classified as “requiring medical treatment”; the remaining majority being supposed to need no treatment.
The rate of detection of tuberculosis “requiring medical treatment” was high in males aged 50 years or more.
Less than half of these detected cases were actually registered as patients, and most of them were 50 years old or more, and quite a few had a history of tuberculosis.
When the patients who were actually treated for tuberculosis are taken as the numerator, the rate of detection is as low as 0.0096%.
3. Detection4 of Lung Cancer
Among 130 subjects which were considered to have lung tumor on the basis of direct radiography, a confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer was made in 62 patients, and the rate of detection is 0.017%.
The detection rate of lung cancer was high in males aged 40 years or more, and in females aged 50 years or more.
Adenocarcinomas were the most common, followed by epidermoid cancers.
The primary lung cancer was surgically removed in 63% of the patients, and 39% of those cases were stage 1.
Eleven percent of those patients with lung cancer had actually undergone a detailed examination in the past, without confirmed diagnosis at that time. That failure was attributed to inadequacy of the detailed examination.
From the facts stated above, the following ideas were proposed: exclusion of persons aged younger than 40 years; comparison of radiophotographs with the earlier ones; omission of radiophotographs in cases with previously known findings of tuberculosis and separate handling of subjects with a history of tuberculosis; double-checking of direct radiographs; improvement of the contents of the detailed examination; public education and consultation after the screening; etc.
View full abstract