1. About TOKYO of the storyed tower, the construction of MITESAKI-style is completed at the end of ancient, but measured unity is completed in mediaeval ages. KARAYO (ZEN-style) is used besides traditional WAYO in the middle of mediaval ages, and there is few pure KARAYO but many KARAYO that is combind WAYO, because tower is the most traditional building and span decrease in proportion to upper storeis. 2. The scale of TOKYO's member (DAITO, HIJIKI, MAKITO etc.) are proportionate the tower's span generally, but the rafter is not so, till ROKUSHIGAKE-system is completed. DAITO of the tower is larger than other buildings, but MAKITO, HIJIKI and the rafter are equal scale, because they are connected with ROKUSHIGAKE-system. In case of KARAYO also there are many KARAYO that has the proportion of WAYO. 3. TOKYOGUMI is set on the basis of HIJIKI-length that using an integer, and MAKITO-interval is not equal with TESAKI-extension at ancient. In mediaeval ages TOKYOGUMI is set on the basis of SHIWARI-system and so MAKITO-interval is equal with TESAKI-extension. At the storyed tower as ROKUSHIGAKE-system is completed lately as SHIWARI-system in comparison with other buildings. The measure of TOKYO's member decrease in proportion to upper stories generally, but the rate of decrease is less than span, and they are equal over all stories except DAITO in the end of mediaeval ages. Also TOKYOGUMI of KARAYO is set on the basis of SHIWARI-system or parcentage fit for it, and that is set many supposing ROKUSHIGAKE-system in case of OGIDARUKI. I think there is fundamentally consideration of WAYO in KARAYO.
View full abstract