The Glycohemoglobin (GHb) StaUardization Comittee conducted the fourth external quality assessment to evaluate the interlaboratory variation of GHb values measured by various methods incluing HPLC, various kinds of immunoassay (IMA) and affinity chromatographic methods in 1, 879 institutes throughout the country using four samples (2concentrated whole blood and 2 lyophilized hemolysate).
We got the following results,
1) The CVs as indices of the interlaboratory variation ranged from 6.0% to 8.6% when all data were combined. It was different depeuing on an analytical method used: HPLC, 3.3%-5.4%; IMA, 6.2%-7.7%; Affinity, 7.0%-7.9%.
2) The rneans of the measured values were different depending on a method used. The value measured by the affinity chromatographic method was significantly higher than the others.
The value of a lyophilized hemolysate measured by turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay was remarkably lower than the othes.
When these exceptional values were excluded, the CVs ranging from 4.6% to 6.2% were good enough from a clinical point of view.
3) The CVs among the GHb value corrected with the assigned values of Japan Diabetes Society (JDS) calibrators ranging from 5.8% to 6.2%, were much smaller than those corrected with other calibrators or without correction, 6.4% to 11.9%.
4) Percent distributions of participants classified by the upper value of their reference interval for GHb were as follows:≤5.8%, 62.7%; 5.9%-6.0%, 17.7% and ≥6.1%, 19.7%.
In conclusion, the interlaboratory difference in GHb measurement was reduced to a clinically permissible level, when the values measured by a certain kinds of method were exclued from calculation. These exceptional values should be properly corrected with the assigned values of an improved calibrator.
View full abstract