1) The Epidemiology Data Committee started in 1988 to compile information from the literature regarding the prevalence and incidence of diabetes among Japanese people.Information was collected from on-line searches of the Japanese Medical Literature and by various other methods. Main sources of data included original articles in medical journals, proceedings from meetings, andofficial publications from the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Each article was evaluated by two members of the Committee. Approximately 60 articles were finally adoped and the principal data are summarized in 13 tables.
2) Community-based studies on adult diabetes gave only prevalnce data. In early studies, people were first screened by urine glucose tests at arbitrary times of 1-2 hours after a meal or glucose loading. Subjects who were positive for glucosuria were further evaluated by glucose tolerance tests (GTTs). Recent studies used 75g GTTs without prior urine screening. but 50g GTTs were more popular in earlier studies. Before 1984, most reports used the criteria advocated by the Japan Diabetes Society (1970), in which the blood glucose levels defining diabetic type were lower than in the present WHO criteria (1980). After 1985 WHO criteria were used widely, Before 1984, the prevalence of diabetes in subjects aged 40 years of older was 1.3-4.7% by urine glucose screening followed byGTTs. After 1985, the prevalence of diabetes in subjects older than 40 years was 2.1-5.4% when first screened by urine glucose tests, and 4-11%when all participants were tested using GTTs. The prevalence was as high as 10% in several studies carried out in 1988-1990, despite that WHO criteria being more stringent in defining diabetes than those from the Japan Diabetes Societ (1970). The prevalence of diabetes was higher in men than in women. The men: women ratio ranged 2: 1 to1: 1.
3) The incidence of diabetes in people younger than 18 years was 0.8-2.3 per 100, 000 per year. The peak incidence was observed among 10-14 year-old age group.There was no clear increasing temporal trend in IDDM incidence, nor were there any significant differences between northern and southern parts of Japan.The prevalence of IDDM in young people (<18years) was0.5-1.5 per 10, 000 when both types of diabetes were included.
4) Approximately 100, 000 atomic bomb survivors have been prospectively followed up for health evaluations since 1960's. As the exposure to the atomic bomb did not affect the development of diabetes, the data are regarded as equivalent to the community-based survey. These people are now older than 43 years. and the prevalence of diabetes was recently estimated to be 9.9%in men and 8.0%in women. There was an increase in prevalence of diabetes during the follow-up period.
5) Diabetes is more prevalent in the first and second generations of Japanese immigrants into Hawaii, Los Angelos and Seattle, in the USA. Recent studies in Seattle revealed that the prevalence of diabetes in the second generation immigrants older than 45 years of age was 21.5%in men and 16.1% in women.
6) Some publications from the Ministry of Health and Welfare in the government of Japan included the data on diabetes. These data were based on information on the known diabetic patients who were visiting medical clinics or hospitals. Naturally, the estimated prevalence was much lower than that obtained by the community surveys. However, this is a good source of information regarding long-term trends in the number of diabetic patients, because the data were collected nationwide using the same methods since 1950's or 1960's. The estimated prevalence of diabetes was 1.7% from the 1987 Patient Survey, and 1.1%from the 1989 Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions of the People on Health and Welfare.This represented a 30-fold increase in the number of diabetic patients compared to early surveys. However, this increasing trend may be overestimated.
View full abstract