This paper comprises a brief summary of results obtained by computing the river floor variations in the 100km long stretch of “Tone” river from the data available.
The mean heights of river bed and the cross sectional areas of 33 gauge stations were measured and recorded by the Branch Office of Ministry of Construction.
These measurements were made 9 times during 16 years (1938-1954). Each station number shows its location, that is, a station number is proportional to the accumulated distance from the starting point (Toride Bridge).
The mean heights and the cross sectional areas are compared one after another. The elevation of river floor and the decrease of cross sectional areas may mean that filling up occured in the river floor, while, the degradation of river floor and the increase of cross sectional areas indicate that scouring occured.
On the basis of assumption above mentioned, changes of river floor heights (
ΔH) and of cross sectional areas (
ΔS) are tabulated in Tab. -2. (+
ΔH and +
ΔS indicate the quantity of deposition, while -
ΔH and -
ΔS indicate that of scour)
Figure 2 and 3 shows relation between these values of
ΔH and
ΔS and distance from the starting point. The abscissae are the distance and the ordinates are the values of
ΔH and
ΔS in each period of time. The plots are made from figures of Tab. -2.
From Fig. 2 and 3 it is simply convinced that deposition and scouring occured alternately in each station, in other words, there is no station where only deposition or scouring occured during 16 years.
It is also clear that there is no period when only deposition or scouring occured in the whole stretch.
Therefore, deposition and scouring must had been acting upon river floor by turns. Moreover, the sections of deposition and scouring move towards downstream suggesting the effect of sand bank movement.
Fig. 4 shows the relation between river width, river slope and standard deviation of
ΔH and
ΔS (σ
1, σ
2)
The channel seems to be possible to divide into 3 sections from Fig. 2, 3 & 4. Namely, section (B): a section where comparatively little river-bed changes and small values of σ
1 & σ
2 are recognized.
Section (A): upperstream of section (B), where river width and slope are both great and river-bed changes are intense. Section (C): downstream of section (B), like section (A), river-bed changes are great, but river slope is not so steep as section (A), in addition, the river width are wider than section (B).
The tendency of deposition and scouring from both values of
ΔH and
ΔS do not always coincide. (see Fig. 5) In general, in the neighborhood of confluence, these incoincidence of tendency are extreme. For example, at the confluence of “Kinu” river, the reverse tendency was found to be the case.
So, flow conditions and the shape of cross section are thought to be very complicated to make the aspect of deposition and scouring more complex.
It may be possible that the future investigation will show the theoretical approach to this problem.
View full abstract