When the Ritsuryo (_??__??_) state (the statutory state ruled by the 
Ritsuryo Code in ancient Japan) with its nuclear region in Kinai (the central part of ancient Japan, i. e., 
Yamato, Yamashiro, Kawachi, Settsu, and 
Izumi provinces which altogether constitute the chief part of the 
Kinai district of Japan today) advanced to northeastern Japan, it came to contact with the system and culture of 
Yezo (_??__??_), a strong peripheral people in northeastern Japan. The author calls this region where both systems or cultural powers met the transitional zone of the 
Ritsuryo state and 
Yezo. It is necessary to analyse ar-chaeological materials and historical records of both the 
Ritsuryo state and 
Yezo, but we cannot find any historical materials clearly recorded by 
Yezo. Accordingly, for the study of the regional structure of the transitional zone, the author thinks that we should inquire the gradually dissolving process through which 
Yezo people or the 
Yezo territory became other than what they had once been and came to be integrated into the 
Ritsuryo state system. Such an analysis involves, the author thinks, an important problem and significance in historical geography. This paper is one of the author's serial historical studies of the transitional zone.
 In this paper, however, the author does not intend to study the historical changes, but to inquire the physical geographical conditions of the transitional zone which might support his . further work. The study is not a mere restoration of the ancient natural landscapes, but an investigation of the natural conditions and geographical factors needed for the understanding of the regional structure of the ancient transitional zone.
 The author focuses his attention on the period in which 
josaku (_??__??_) (the forts built in northeastern Japan in the ancient period) were constructed; i. e., from about the middle to the end of the 
Nara period. This was the period in which the 
Tai-i (_??__??_) Policy (the policy taken to apply the Ritsuryo state system over 
Yezo) was actively enforced in northeastern Japan. The 
Ritsuryo government constructed five forts (socalled the 
Tempyo no go-saku _??__??_) and two forts of 
Momoo (_??__??_) and 
Ichi (_??__??_) in the 
Tempyo time. Thus, the 
Sempoku area (the northern half of the Sendai plains) was the stage of the significant 
Tai-i activities. And yet, in the 
Sempoku area, settlements were only gradually incorporated into the local administrative system. Before the Ritsuryo Era, the 
yokoana-kofun (_??__??__??__??_) culture of the 
Kofun (_??__??_) Era (the first half of the ancient age) had advanced to the basin of the River 
Hazama running in the northern fringe of the 
Sempoku area. Therefore, it is clear that the advance of 
Kinai culture and of the 
Ritsuryo state system into northeastern Japan stopped in the 
Sempoku area. Questioning why the advance was stagnating in that area is a significant problem in historical geography.
 On the factors of the stagnation in the transitional area, the author speculates as follows. Analysis of the northern culture (the culture of the prehistoric 
Hokkaido earthen vessel) shows that the southern limit of distribution of the 
Hokkaido-type earthenwares is generally found at the north fringe of the 
Sempoku area. Moreover, the dense distribution of the 
Ainu placenames has its southern limit roughly in the basin of the River 
Hazama, namely, at the northern fringe of the 
Sempoku area.
 To the north of the 
Sempoku area, namely, in the middle course basin of the River 
Kitakami, a powerful 
Yezo people settled. For this reason, when the 
Ritsuryo state system forged ahead into the middle course basin of the 
Kitakaani,
 View full abstract