In 1965, about 32 per cent of the cultivated land in Japan was the ordinary field, although the arable farming consisted chiefly of the paddy field cultivation.
The distribution of ordinary field was remarkably concentrated in four areas, namely Hokkaido, Northern Tôhoku, Kanto and Southern Kyushu, and the dominant type of farming practice in these areas was the ordinary field cultivation.
Examining the ordinary field cultivation, the dominant size of the small family farms. excluding those in Hokkaido, is less than two ha., and by 1955 the standard of farming methods was so backward that the level of productivity was very low.
On the other hand, one of the most striking features of economic changes in Japan during the period from 1955 to 1970 was on the increase in industrial productivity. At the same time the level of paddy rice productivity has also increased. On the contrary the production of ordinary field cultivation has shown a notable decline.
In order to clarify the mechanism of this trend, I made a case study analysing ordinary field cultivation in the northern part of Iwate Prefecture in Tohoku District. The results obtained by this investigation are as follows. Around 1955 the most important feature of ordinary field farming in this region was its backwardness. The typical size of production was covered by the small-scale farm management (see Table 3), and the old traditional farming practice still remained dominant. The basic crop rotation for two years consisted of burnyard millet, wheat and soybeans. Since 1955 this economic state of agriculture has began to change under the impact of rapidly expanding imports, particularly, of less expensive wheat and soybeans mainly from the United States.
As a result of the impact, the trend of prices in wheat and soybeans has been unfavorable, and the ordinary field cultivation has most severely been hit by this unstable situation. As shown in Table 5 the acreage of wheat and soybeans has begun to decrease remarkably. There were numerous efforts to improve such straitened circumstances. One of the attempts was to introduce intensive cash crops and livestock, especially dairy cattle. But this was nearly in vain except in the case of livestock raising due to three factors: the minute and fragmentary nature of farm enterprises, the predominance of backward farming methods and the instability of market prices with the low level of producer prices.
On the other hand, as shown in Table 6, there was an increase, to a certain extent, in dairy and beef cattle. The small size of herd prevailed in the region, so that a tendency towards stagnation and decline has become apparent in recent years.
The decline of ordinary field cultivation and the stagnation of livestock raising shows the fact that the majority of farmers have become increasingly dependent either on rice farming or on non-agricultural sources of income.
The guaranteed rice price of the Government for producers has been kept relatively higher. Thus the paddy rice cultivation was remarkably spread by the conversion of ordinary fields into paddy fields during the period of 1960 and 1970, especially after 1965. But the rice production in Japan has expanded rapidly since 1955, and they have had surplus production for the past several years.
Therefore, the Japanese Government has been obliged to restrain the rice farming areas since 1970, and the rice farming increase in this region has stopped with great difficulties.
In these circumstances the farmers in this region are almost hopeless to the agriculture itself, and the employment of non-agricultural labour for the farming population has intensely been going on in recent years.
View full abstract