Wave-cut benches developed along the coast of the Miura Peninsula (Fig. 1) were uplifted at the time of the Great Kanto Earthquake in 1923. The amount of the uplift was estimated at about 1.4m. Wave-cut benches in the studied area (Fig. 2) are composed of steeply inclined Miocene strata of rhythmic alternation of tuff and mudstone; the strata strike about N 60 E and dip about 70 S (Fig. 3 and 4). On the surface of the benches, washboard-like relief is observed ; the relief attains a relative height of 5-300cm. There always exist tuff layers in ridges of the relief; on the other hand, furrows are of mudstone layers (Fig. 4). Numerous minor joints develop on the surface of mudstone layers as compared with tuff ones. The field observation proves that the joint development in mudstone is obviously due not to tectonic deformation but to weathering.
Figure 5 a gives a definition sketch, where
H is the greater of the two relative heights of one ridge,
A the thickness of a tuff layer, and
D the thickness of the whole strata con-stituting the ridge. Figure 5 b shows the relationship between I-I and
A, for various
A/
D; the relative height of ridges increases in proportion to the thickness of tuff layers making them up. Then, the authors examined the relationship between the greater of the two relative heights of one ridge (
H) and the interval to adjoining ridges (
L) (Fig. 6 a), ignoring ridges where the thickness of tuff layers is less than 20cm. Figure 6 b shows that
H increases as
L is increased, in other words, the degree of depression of furrows increases in proportion to the thickness of mudstone layers. Figures 5 b and 6 b prove that the kind and thickness of layers control the washboard-like relief on the surface of the benches.
In order to clarify the mechanism of the washboard-like relief formation, first of all, the authors examined physical and mechanical properties of tuff and mudstone in various states. Table 1 gives physical properties of both rocks. Figure 7 indicates the relationship between the unconfined compressive strength (hereafter referred to as the “compressive strength”) and the water content of specimens. The compressive strength decreases with the increase of the water content; the strength of mudstone is about two times as great as that of tuff for any water content. Table 2 shows that propagation velocity of longitudinal waves (
Vp) in mudstone is higher than that in tuff, regardless of their direction to the bedding planes. The results mean that tuff is more porous and weaker than mudstone, and they consist qualitatively with the results of a compression test (Fig. 7). Table 3 shows the results of a wear test by using the Los Angels abrasion machine. Wear in a mill of this machine is produced by both abrasion and impact, so that the results represent not only the abrasive hardness and impact strength of rocks, The abrasive hardness and impact strength of mudstone are much greater than those of tuff, regardless of the water content of specimens. The aforementioned strength such as the compressive strength, the abrasive hardness and the impact strength implies the strength or resistibility of rocks against external forces, and these results prove that mudstone is stronger than tuff. It has been considered in Geomorphology, in general, that “strong” or “hard” rocks remain uneroded and then protrusive. In the present studied area, on the contrary, ridges, or protrusive parts, are of tuff which is weaker or softer than mudstone constituting furrows, or depressed parts. Therefore, it is impossible to explain, in terms of the geomorphological concept as mentioned above, the formation of the washboard-ike relief in question.
View full abstract