Up to the present, there are many investigations on the temperature dependences of mechanical properties of steels at low temperatures. However, the temperature dependences have been divided into three or four regions by merely thinking of the deformation mechanisms which depend on wavy slip or twinning. As a result, there are unsolved problems such as considerations of the differences in expressive equation and in strain rate and the application of dislocation theory.
In this study, the correlativity between temperature dependences on Vickers hardness, the tensile properties and the impact energy for several kinds of commercial steels was examined, and some considerations were given to the deformation mechanism in each region.
\
oindentThe results obtained are as follows:
(1) σ
0.2% vs
T1⁄2 curve and
V* vs
T1⁄2 curve consist of three straight lines whose gradients change at the temperatures
TT0,
TT1 and
TV*0,
TV*1. Each region of the three straight lines are named Regions I, II and III, respectively. Region I corresponds to the athermal deformation field, Region II to the cross slip field, and Region III to the Peierls deformation field.
(2) While, both Hv vs
T1⁄2 curve and logHv vs 1⁄
T curve have four straight lines, i.e., Regions, I, II, III and IV. Region IV is considered to correspond to the twinning deformation field.
(3) The correspondence between the mutation temperatures
HT0 and
HT1 in the logHv vs 1⁄
T curve and
VT1 and
VT2 in the log
E vs 1⁄
T curve is very good for the case of 1⁄
HT0 vs 1⁄
VT1 and 1⁄
HT1 vs 1⁄
VT2 and the correspondence between the transition temperature
VTrE or
VTrS in the impact test and
HT0 or
HT1 is better at 1⁄
VTrE or 1⁄
VTrS vs 1⁄
HT1.
View full abstract