I videotaped music classes taught by seven preservice teachers at Miyazaki University Junior High School for three weeks. The videos were evaluated according to 17 criteria, such as "Did he/she manage somehow to raise students' motivation and interest?", by two teachers from a university Elementary School, one from a Junior High School, and two from a university. Factor analysis was carried on the scores for 16 criteria given by the five evaluators. The 17th factor, "General evaluation" was not included here. The result indicated clearly that two major factors namely "Management" and "Fellowship" could be considered to explain variance in the scores for those 16 criteris. The seven preservice teachers were classified in three groups of "Management-Fellowship", "Fellowship" and "Low Growth" according to the differences of the factor score. I classified information on Class Observation Sheet given by the preservice teachers of each group and their instructor in the following five categories: "Fact or Impression", "Evaluation", "Suggestion", "Alternative Proposal" and "Explanation". Results from a chi-square test showed that the preservice teachers in the "Fellowship" and "Low Growth" groups wrote significantly more about Evaluation. Whereas preservice teachers in the "Management-Fellowship" group wrote significantly more about Explanation.
View full abstract