The degree of seriousness and improvement of bronchial asthma have been determined after a long term of clinical observation. In this study, 12 items concerning patients' symptoms, signs in the 1st medical examination and laboratory findings (sex, onset age, atopic dermatitis, family history of allergy, positive counts in skin tests, skin reaction to house dust, molds and pollens, IgE (RIST), eosinophile counts, IgG, start of therapy) were analysed by the Quantification Theory (Type II). Then, the possibility of prognosis presumption with bronchial asthma was studied. Concerning the degree of seriousness, the descrimination ratio between the mild group and the moderate + severe groups was 82.31%. Concerning the degree of improvement, the descrimination ratio between the markedly improved + improved groups and the no change + deteriorated groups was 78.65%. These results reveal that it's possible to expect the degree of seriousness and improvement by using 12 items. To examination the influence of each item on the prognosis, I calculated the correlation ratio and selected 6 items (onset age, atopic dermatitis, family history of allergy, positive counts in skin tests, IgE (RIST) and eosinophile counts) which were recognized as being dependent of the other items. The range ratio of these 6 items was investigated and the greatest factor of influence on the prognosis was eosinophile counts and followed by onset age. It is concluded that the Quantification Theory (Type II) applied to patients' symptoms, signs in the 1st medical examination and laboratory findings was usefull in the prognosis presumption with bronchial asthma.
View full abstract