ERCPs were performed in 444 cases. In well opacified 365 pancreatograms, the abnormal changes were morphologically studied. The results were as follows:
1) Incidence of abnormal pancreatogram, normal pancreatogram, insufficient opaci-fication and no visualization was 27.5%, 54.7%, 1.1% and 16.7%, respectively.
2) The “rat-tail”like stricture of main pancreatic duct (m. p. d.) and “long and tight irregularity”were the most characteristic signs in pancreatic cancer (P. C.).
3) ‘Long but not tight irregularity’;was due to pancreatitis.
4) In 11 cases of ‘m. p. d. obstruction’, incidence of P. C. was 72.7%. Mode of ob-struction in P. C. differed from that in other diseases.
5) ‘Partial stricture with proximal beaded changes’was recognized in 11 cases. Inci-dence of P. C. was 63.6%. Degree of stricture in P. C. was higher than that in chronic-pancreatitis.
6) One case of P.C. showed ‘partial stricture with proximal dilatation’.
7) One third cases with ‘partial stricture with no dilatation’was P. C. This changes was not diagnostic sign.
8) Three out of 8 cases with ‘m. p. d. dislocation’was P. C.
9) Other changes in c. b. d. were ‘rigidity’, ‘slight beaded sign’, ‘smooth dilatation’, ‘radiolucent filling defect’and ‘cyst formation’. It may be true that all the changes are the indication of benign conditions.
10) ‘Partial absence of lateral branches’was shown in two cases. One was P. C. and the other was carcinoma of common bile duct. In the former, ‘dislocation of m. p. d.’was ac-companied.
11) ‘Multiple micro cyst’, ‘partial parenchymography’, ‘irregular and rigid branches’and ‘dilated branches’were the signs of benign conditions.
12) The cause of unsuccessful cannulation was the deformity of duodenum. The de-formity was probably due to tumor infiltration.
13) Pancreaticoduodenectomy was successful in one case out of 31 with P. C.
14) A rare case was presented. In this case, unresectable pancreatic tumor was con-firmed at operation. No changes was recognized in its pancreatogram.
View full abstract