Critical path has now become popular among national hospitals all around Japan. In the symposium, Dr. Mukohara MD overviewed the situation as follows: according to the results of questionnaires answered by national hospitals and sanatoriums in the legislature of Regional Medical Office of Kyushu, the numbers of critical path have doubled from 330 in 1999 to over 600 in 2000. The results also pointed out the standardizing of quality of care, which was the primary common demand of both physicians and nurses. Secondary, physicians emphasized on improvement of practice efficiency and nurses did on patient's satisfaction.
Also, there are certain backgrounds associated with payment system of medical fee. Dr. Yoshida MD referred to the relationships between critical path and DRG/PPS, under tested at the National Hospital of Kyushu Medical Center and he stressed on the inevitableness of the combination: DRG/PPS and critical path. Dr. Yoshida MD found effects of DRG/PPS as foll owings: utilizing ICD code, reduce of unnecessary laboratory exam and medical treatments, reduce of hospital length of stay, submit of accurate discharge summary, increase of the numbers of out-patients, facilitating home health care, improvement on hospital workers' cost consciousness and encouragement of teamwork, and preventing increases on medical expen diture. Contrary, DRG/PPS was not applicable to those on cases using special material such as hip joint replacements. Also note that the critical path was introduced into the April 2000 revisions of the National Insurance Payment System in term of detailed in-hospitalization plan. This was one of the factors that helped the outbreak of critical path in Japan.
The clinical effects of critical path have been indicated as well. Dr. Iida MD indicated on diabetic patient using critical path showed significantly lower HBAIC than the unused cases. Mr. Tsurumi also stated positive effects of critical path as follows: the effects of nutritional assessments systemized by dietician and that he found significant low fasting blood sugar level at the discharge point. The reason of this was explained by the improvement of patients' self understandings, Ms Yamazaki RN described that she found improvement on lung resection cases with critical path. She noted the changes of operation should effect: however, in comparison of each 50 cases before and after the implementation of critical path, she found improvement in the hospital length of stay, lung capacity volume, and six-minuets-walk distance before and after the operations. Critical path totally lead improvement of patients physical condition.
Dr. Nomura MD emphasizes the needs of setting outcome at the point of starting of critical path and outcome evaluations. Especially he stressed the importance of milestone outcomeset ting and discharge criteria. With this, more sufficient result could be expected. In the case of hip joint replacement, time needed to achieve the milestone outcome hove shortened in comparison of before and after the critical path implementation. He added that they had improvements on shortening of hospitalization terms, patients' satisfaction, job efficiencies, and material costs down. As further task, Dr. Nomura cosidered how much degree they can take EBM to critical pathway, evaluations of critical path that combines outpatient and inpat Tent, critical-path connected with health care institute of local district and long-term outcomeeffect of critical path applied cases.
From the side of pharmacists: Ms. Wada mentioned that stadardizations on medication had positive merits. For example, preventing incorrect medication of drugs was one of them. As the result of clinical procedure standardized, comparison of clinical and economical effectiveness, and side effects on different drugs could become easy to be evaluated. Mr. Wako, as coordinator on day surgery center, described critical path was an inevitable tool. According to the survey, offec
View full abstract