Forty-seven patients with temporomandibular arthrosis during the 11-month period from July 1980 to May 1981 were studied clinically. Factors analyzed were age, sex, etiological factors, clinical symptoms, method of therapy and therapeutic results.
The patients consisted of 8 males and 39 females. The female patients represented the overwhelming majority. The largest age group was patients in their 20's with 14 cases, and followed by patients in 30's, 40's and 50's in order of frequency.
The chief complaints were pain in 28 patients (59.5%), limitation of motion in 11 (23.4%) and crepitus in TMJ in 8 patients (17.2%). The appearance of initial symptoms tended to occur in the same order as that of the chief complaints, namely, pain, limitation of motion, and crepitus in TMJ.
The interval from the first appearance of symptoms until the initial visit to the hospi-tal was from 1 to 3 months in 14 cases which was the largest group: the shortest period was 3 days and the longest period was 8 years. Before visiting our department, 18 patients (38.3%) had been treated previously at orthopedic, neurological or dental department as recorded in their past histories.
The symptoms observed during the initial examination included pain, which was seen in 89.4%, i, e., the greatest majority of cases, followed by limitation of motion in 46.0%, mandibular devitation upon opening the mouth in 25.5% and crepitus in TMJ in 19.2%. About 50% of 47 patients suffered from complications involving 2 or more symptoms.
The etiological factors included tooth malalignment, malocclusion, excessive opening of the mouth, external injury, the presence of a dental prosthesis, orthodontic treatment, or such bad habits as grinding of the teeth. The number of patients for whom no etiological factor was clearly determined was rather large.
The following methods of therapy were used either singly or in combination: drug thera-py, bite plate, occlusal equilibration, dental treatment, and etc. In only 4 patients complete relief of all symptoms were obtained but in the remaining 43 cases the symptoms were improved to the point that they did not cause a severe interference with daily activities, but some symptoms still remained, which suggests the great difficulty in diagnosing and treating temporomandibular arthrosis.
View full abstract