Strictly speaking, a silent stone should be defined as one which is entirely free of complaints, in spite of the presence of a stone throughout the clinical course.
However, it is difficult to prove that the patient is completely asymptomatic.
Thus, it would seem more appropriate to interprete the term as a comprehensive ex-pression including cases which occasionally have such slight and indefinite abdominal symp-toms as not interfering with the daily life.
The reason is that it is difficult to ascribe these complaints to cholelithiasis.
From such a viewpoint, 58(6.07%) out of 954 cases of cholesystectomy operated between 1973 and 1980 were considered the so-called silent stone cases. The cases were broken down to 23 female (38-69 years of age) and 35 female cases (25-74 years of age), cases over 50 years of age was 65.5 percent.
When surgical findings, histopathological findings of resected gallbladder and DIC find-ings were examined, more than 80 percent of the cases showed evidence of inflammation, there being many choesterol calcli.
The majority of the cases showing evidence of adhesion, RAS, thickening of the wall and cholesterosis had floating stones irrespective of the size of stone;nearly half of the cases with negative cholecystograms showed thickening of the wall, floating calculi being seen in many cases.
The followings are indications for surgery in silent stone cases.
1) Where roentgenograms reveal many floating, stones where cholecystograms are negative, where the wall is irregular and where the contraction is poor.
2) Cases over 60 years of age, showing good general conditions. Cases under 60 years of age, complicated with diabetes.
3) Cases not responding to lithotriptics.
View full abstract