During pre-adolescence, the proportion of the body continuously changes because of the different rates of growth in different parts. The purpose of this study was to classify the growth patterns by the relative growth of height and body-weight. The materials used for this study were the longitudinal data in 61 boys ranging from 6 to 14 years old, taken in 1952〜60. The method was as follows; nine age points from 6 to 14 years old were plotted for every boy by the longitudinal data of the height and body-weight on the graph, in which the body-weight was represented on the vertical axis and the height on the horizontal one in logarithms, respectively. Some proper straight lines of allometry were drawn by passing through more than three age points on the individual graph. According to the number of phase and slope (a), the growth patterns were classified into 7 patterns (designated as pattern II-A, II-B, III-A, III-B, III-C, III-D, and IV). The equation of average allometry for each pattern was computed from the "reduced major axis" on a double logarithmic diagram. The use of this "reduced major axis" had been adovocated by Kermack and Haldane (1950). The discrimination between "monophasic allometry" and "polyphasic allometry" was based on application of the significance test for the difference of slopes and positions between the reduced major axes of different growth stages. The results obtained were as follows; 1) The boys who belonged to uniphasic pattern (a=2.527576) throughout the growing period from 6 to 14 years old were 3.45%. 2) The boys who belonged to diphasic pattern (a_1=2.112577, a_2=3.011993), for which the critical point was assumed at 135.7cm in height and 28.7kg in body-weight, were 72.41%. Moreover, the boys who belonged to diphasic pattern (a_1=2.539060, a_2=2.855534), for which the critical point was not assumed, were 6.9%. 3) The boys who belonged to triphasic pattern (a_1=2.458681, a_2=2.016009, a_3=2.960105), for which the critical point was assumed both at 126.5cm in height and 24.5kg in bodyweight and at 134.2cm and 27.7kg, respectively, were 17.24%.
View full abstract