The patient was 10-year-old boy with a teratoma arising in the pineal body. The tumor was surgically removed. Postoperatively he developed signs of severe meningial irritation which lasted for two weeks. A divergence nystagmus appeared during this period and was still observed four weeks after the operation, and the electronystagmography CENG) indicated the eye movements as follows:
1. Upon forward and upward gaze, a rhythmic nystagmus appeared. This nystagmus peculiarly comprised the diverging quick phase and converging slow phase.
2. Upon gaze vacant or through Frenzel's glasses, the eyeballs moved symmetrically but not rhythmically, thus in fashion not to be called a nystagmus, although the divergent movement was evident.
3. Nystagmus to the right was observed on gaze to the right, and vice versa.
4. Typical opto-kinetic nystagmus, either to the right or left, was not induced, and an opto-kinetic inversion appeared on some occasions.
In order to explain the divergence nystagmus, the following mechanism may be assumed.
Physi ologically the bilateral eyeballs move conjunctly. In order to make such a conjunct movement possible, there must be neural connections between the muscles of the two eyeballs. A muscle of one eyeball must have a reciprocal innervanation with the corresponding muscle of the other eye and an identical innervation with its antagonist.
Let us suppose fo ur different locations of lesion as shown in Fig. 4. In case of lesion A, even if the right eyeball moves to the right, the left cannot move to the right conjunctly. However, the innervation for the lateral movement of the left eyeball remains intact, and the left eyeball moves to the left when the right eyeball moves to the left. If the right eyeball moves slightly to the left before moving to the right, the left eyeball moves to the left conjunctly and stays as it was. This is the way, in our opinion, how the divergent nystagmus occurs.
In cases of lesions B, C and D, no possibility is thought to exist for the divergence nystagmus to occur. The site of lesion A should be presumed to be in the region of the abducens nucleus, and such a lesion in association with mesencephalic involvement should be an extremely rare occurence.
Only two cases of divergent nystagmus have been rep orted in the literature before this present case.
抄録全体を表示