Introduction: The body surface of warm-blooded animals including man is vibrating constantly, but invisibly. Although the natures of this invisible vibration has not been satisfactorily determined ; the phenomenon is thought to be due to-muscle fiber tonus or the other factors, for example, the action of autonomic nervous system and heart beat. This vibration has been called Microvibration by ROHRACHE (R1 954).
KAWATA (1958), of this laboratory, noted that it was possible to detect a small change to auditory stimuli in the original waves of Microvibration (MV), before visualization.
The purpose of this paper is to report a new method for measuring the auditory acuity in adult objectively by means of the MV-response to auditory stimulation.
Methods: To record the MV it was used a specially designed pickup with the vacuum tube (RCA 5734)(see figure 1). This small pickup had a square measure of 2.0×4.5 cm
2 and a weight of 20 gm. In actual use, it was connected to MV-analyzer C Nihon Koden Co. Tokyo) for the vibration to be multiplied in amplitude.
The sound stimulation consisted of white noise, generated from NYA-II audiometer (Nagashima Co. Tokyo), which was coupled to MV-analyzer in such a way that the beginning of stimulation was measured exactly. The blockdiagram of the stimulating and recording equipments used is shown in Figure 2.
The subjects with normal hearing or various hearing deficits were previously examined by routine auditory test with pure tone and white noise, and kept in bed in a supine position, in a dark sound proof room. Their eyes were closed, and they were made as relaxed as possible. Then the pickup was laid loosely on the body surface (mainly on the palpebral area) for MV-recording.
When the original wave of MV was stable C generally about 18 min. after resting), the subjects were stimulated with white noise through a receiver. Each stimulus lasted 3 or 5 sec, and at adequate intervals the stimuli were repeated with different intensities using both ears.
Problems encountered:
1. MV-wave initial irregularity. MV-wave, as shown in Fig. 4, was irregular and unstable immediately after the subject reclined on the bed. The irregularity, however, disappeared after 18 min. of resting in the supine position. Hence a waiting period was neccessary in order to accurately measure the responses.
2. The interval of stimulations. With 30 dB above the auditory threshold, the same ear was stimulated for 3 sec at intervals of 10, 20 and 60 sec respectively. In each case the 10th response at an interval of 60 sec was still presented, as shown in Fig. 6, while the one at interval of 10 or 20 sec was already indistinct.
3. The recognition of response. The positive responses were identified by the increased amplitude only of the original MV-wave during stimulation. In order to determine the response threshold an increased amplitude with latent period within 1.0 sec after stimulation was interpreted as the response.
Results:
1. The most sensitive position for recording MV-response among the forehead, palpebra, cheek, palm and leg was at palpebral area as shown in Fig. 3.
2. The response-differences between the right and the left palpebral area were no remarkble as shown in Fig. 8.
3. In spite of very intense sound intensities, the MV-responses were not elicited at the palpebral area of subjects with deafness and peripheral facial nerve paresis. A similar MV-response was also elicited by stimulating the external ear with cold (20°C) water, as shown in Fig. 7.
4. The responses were devided into following three types ; on-response, intermediate response and off-response as shown in Fig. 10. In actual recordings, various combinations of these respose-types were seen as shown in Table 1.
5. The latency was studied on 691 cases which responded with various intensities. as shown in Table 2. The values within 1.0 sec were found in 74.0% of the cases.
抄録全体を表示