Referring to the distribution of Group A streptococci in Japan, the data up to March 1969 have already been reported devidedly in separate papers, in which the annual details of the strains collected in each institution since April 1969 were described. Further a figure presenting the histograms of the main predominant types for the past 10 years was depicted to show retrospectively the transition of the types, at the time just a decade has past since we started T-typing.
During the whole survey period the situation of type 12 and type 4 has not essentially changed in the context that they represented two major types. This was to be seen in the tables as well as in the figure. The situation of other three types 6, 22 and 1 which had shown relative predominancy in incidence as compared with other types of minor incidence has also not changed throughout the period except in 1974 when a new type, type 3, joined for the first time in this group and, instead, type 6 dropped out of the group. Among these members types 22 and 1 were characteristic in the distribution,
i.e., their incidence was obviously higher in Niigata and Shimane the areas facing the Japan Sea. Similarly in Sapporo facing both the Japan Sea and the Pacific Ocean their incidence was moderately higher in 1969 to 1971. This was to be regarded as an exemplification of the areal aggregation of some specific types.
Through the period of 10 years the incidence of type 12 showed a marked continuous increase from the lowest incidence of 0.9% in 1964 to the highest level of 71.9% in 1974, a particularly impressive steep rise In contrast, type 4 took a different trend. In 1964 it took the premier rank and occupied 55.4%. However, the incidence declined relatively rapidly toward 1968 to 1969, and therefore the transition of the first ranking from type 4 to type 12 took place in 1967 to 1968 as we could see in the Fig. 1, a crossing of two “epidemic waves.”Thereafter the secondary ranking of type 4 being characterized with an undurate curve of incidence has been retained up to now.
The most recent peak in the total number of scarlet fever patient in Japan before 1971 was established in 1963 when the tetracycline resistance developed to a considerable degree after its initial appearance in 1962. In 1964, the following year, a sudden alteration of the premier rank took place and type 4, suppressing the type 6, took the absolute predominance as seen in the Fig. 1. The following mild peak of the number of patient was accomplished in 1971 when the macrolide highresistant strains appeared for the first time in Japan. The marked increase of resistant strains seemed to develope after 1972. The extraordinarily steep increase of the incidence of type 12 seemed to correspond to the maximum developement of the macrolide resistance. This might be clarified with our drug resistance survey which is now under proceeding.
抄録全体を表示