Following the postwar “great Showa era municipal incorporation movement”, Japan’s basic local autonomous political entity came to encompass both urban and rural communities, giving rise to the problem of how to secure regional uniformity in the midst of conflict occurring among former townships(
cho 町)and villages(
mura 村). During Japan’s era of rapid development and economic growth, as local entities entered a new stage of governance dealing with the issues of regional development and welfare programs, how greatly enlarged cities (
shi 市), towns and villages overcame the confusion arising from incorporation and responded to rising economic growth has yet to be taken up in earnest in the research to date, in terms of the conflict that arose among diverse neighborhoods after incorporation in relation to the changing face of regional autonomy due to rapid development. The present article takes up the case of urban development in the township of Todacho, located in Saitama Prefecture on the Arakawa River border with metropolitan Tokyo, in order to analyze how one post-Showa incorporation local entity attempted to secure regional unity, while responding to a booming economy.
During the 1950s, incorporated Toda became the scene of conflict between the neighborhood of former Todacho, which was rapidly urbanizing, and that of former Misasa Village, which was seriously lagging behind. In response, the local government implemented a consolidated urban plan in order to secure uniformity throughout the township. One key to the plan was provided by the designation of Toda as the site for the Tokyo Olympic rowing competition, the construction of which was designed to solve all the post-incorporation rancor. Meanwhile, the Cabinet Office’s National Metropolitan Infrastructure Development Committee chose Toda for its green-belt program, promoting less development in favor of turning the sports facility into a full-fledged national park. The green-belt proposal was opposed by the progressive members of the town assembly, whose constituents comprised newly settled residents in the urbanized eastern neighborhoods, calling for a departure from the administrative policies of administrations supported by residents based on Notable order and introducing a reform program which emphasized central planning and citizen participation. The green-belt proposal was forthwith shelved.
The author concludes that the case of new Todacho shows that urban planning at the time was always aimed towards trying to mitigate the conflict and confusion brought about by large-scale municipal incorporation during the Showa era. Moreover, as a result of the increasing tendency of new basic autonomous entities to suppress traditional solidarity dividing former towns and villages, a new type of regional autonomy was instituted during Japan’s era of rapid growth, based on central urban planning and citizen participation.
View full abstract