The form of the human face interests both anthropologists and ethnologists. After Martin unified the methods of measurement of the human face, many studies were published. We plastic surgeons must know about the form, size, and ratios of the human face. Some studies were performed with X-ray or moiretopography, but most studies used measurements of standar photographs. However, a few papers reported the ratios of transverse facial width to intercanthal distance, the width of the nose, and the width of the lip. In the present study, the author took standard photographs and measured the width of the palpebral fissure, the greatest alar width, the philtrum width, the oral fissure width, and transverse facial width of 56 young Japanese women (mean age, 20.6 years) at rest. The author calculated ratios of measurements and compared the results with those of previous studies. The mean and standard deviation were calculated from each measured value. The average measurements were as follows : width of the palpebral fissure, 28.7±1.72 mm (mean ± SD) ; intercanthal distance, 39.2 ± 2.44 mm ; greatest alar width, 40.0 ± 2.7 mm ; width of oral fissure, 48.9 ± 3.34 mm ; philtrum width, 11.9 ± 1.6 mm ; transverse facial width was 146.8 ± 4.6 mm at the level of the medial canthus ; 135.9 ± 5.45 mm at the level of the greatest alar width, and 115.2 ± 6.51 mm at the level of the oral fissure. The intercanthal distance index was 26.7 ± 2.16, the greatest alar width index was 29.5 ± 1.65, the oral fissure width index was 42.5 ± 3.26, and the philtrum width index was 24.4 ± 3.18. The intercanthal distance-greatest alar width index was 98.1 ± 8.51. The intercanthal distance-oral fissure width index was 80.5 ± 8.92, and the greatest alar width-oral fissure width index was 82.1 ± 6.72. The intercanthal distance and the greatest alar width were almost the same, and were 4/5 of the oral fissure width. The philtrum width was 1/4 of the oral fissure width. The intercanthal distance accounted for 1/4 of the transverse facial width. The greatest alar width accounted for 3/10 of the transverse facial width. The oral fissure width accounted for 2/5 of the transverse facial width. When these results were compared with those of earlier studies, there were differences of 10 to 15 mm in transverse facial width and a maximal difference of 5 mm in oral fissure width. Both this study and erlier studies reported that the philtrum width was 1/4 of the oral fissure width. However, there were differences in intercanthal distance-oral fissure width index and the greatest alar width-oral fissure width index, because the oral fissure width varied among the previous reports.
View full abstract