Infiltrative growth (INF) described in the General Rules for Gastric Cancer Study is concerned deeply with the development of gastric cancer after the establishment of the primary focus and is considered to be one of the important factors that affect the prognosis after resection of gastric cancer. We made a clinicopathological study on how this parameter is concerned with the prognosis and the site of recurrence and related to twelve factors considered to affect the prognosis after resection of gastric cancer-they are age, sex, macroscopic findings such as location of cancerous lesion, macroscopic type, size (major diameter) and histologic findings such as depth of invasion, histologic type, lymph invasion, vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, stroma of cancerous lesion and histological stage. Furthermore, the cases studied were divided into two groups, that is, a shallow layer group (Group A: m, sm, pm) and a deep layer group (Group B: ss, s (+) ), and differences in these relationship were examined on the basis of depth of invasion, 740 cases with curative resection of single primary gastric cancer at this department in the past 26 years (March, 1956-December, 1981) were used as the subject of this study. With regard to INF, the cases were classified as follows: INF a 105 cases (14.2%), INF β 323 cases (43.6%), INF γ 312 cases (42.2%) . Results obtained as follows: As for the prognosis, the cumulative five (ten) -year survival rate were as follows: INF α 64.9% (48.3%), INF 9 55.9% (44.7%), INF γ 53.5% (42.2%) in all the cases; INF α 74.9% (64.9%), INF 5 72.8% (60.9%), INF 89.4% (77.9%) in Group A; INF 56.1% (34.5%), INF 41.8% (31.6%) and INF γ 31.5% (21.0%) in Group B. Among all the cases, INF α had a better prognosis for five-year survival than did INF γ; in Group A, INF α had a better prognosis for five-year survival than did INF α and INF β, and for ten-year survival than did INF β; and in Group B, INF α and INF β had better prognoses for both five- and ten-year survival than did INF γ (p <0.05), showing the significant difference in survival rate with INF depending on the depth of invasion. As for the ralations between INF and other factors affecting the prognosis, INF was found to be characteristically relevant to each of factors such as macroscopic type, hxstologic type, lymph and vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, stroma of cancerous lesion and so on. Calculation of the recurrence rate (given by the number of cases in each type of INF where recurrence occurred divided by the number of cases included in each type of INF) showed that in Group A there was a high incidence of recurrence in liver in INF α (8%) and INF β (9.0%) . In contrast with Group A, Group B had a high recurrence rate in INF β and INF r in particular. INF a had a 12.7% incidence of recurrence in liver. INF β had a 13.5% incidence of recurrence in liver, 11.2% in peritoneum and 6.2% in lymph nodes. INF γ had a 32.6% incidence of recurrence in peritoneum, 7.8% in lymph node, 6.2% in liver and 4.1% in subhepatic space. Depending on depth of invasion, each type of INF had a different association with the site of recurrence in particular. INF β stood between INF α and INF r in the site of recurrence, showing a mutual relationship between INF and site of recurrence.
View full abstract