The effect of vagal unit discharges appearing in the finely desected central end of the cervical vagus nerve and respiration were recorded simultaneously on an oscilloscope in urethane anesthetized rabbits. Some neurons on one side of the severed vagal nerve continuously discharged, with an almost constant frequency. These kinds of discharges changed and became periodic, increasing firing rates during inspiration and decreasing during expiration, and new discharges appeared concomitantly with inspiration or expiration after the other side of the vagus was severed, or when cold-blocked with chlorethyl. Such periodic discharges once again became continuous, and newly-appeared discharges were extinguished by low frequency stimulation of the other side of the vaqus. The continuous discharges were inhibited by high f requeny afferent stimulation of the desected same side vaqus nerve. Central respiratory mechanisms were proposed as following by these vagal respiratory discharges : 1) Two kinds of inspiratory (IC
1 and IC
2) and expiratory (EC
1 and EC
2) centers exist in the respiratory center. 2) EC
2 and IC
2 caused expiratory and inspiratory discharges in the vagus eenters respectively, under abolishment of vagal afferent impulses. 3) IC
1and EC
1converged in some neurons in the vagal center and caused continuous vagal discharging. Vagal afferent nerves inhibited IC
1, which inhibited EC
1, therefore, IC
1excitability is enhanced under the absence of vagal afferent impulses, increasing the firing rate of vagal continuous discharges during inspiration, and increased IC
1excitability enhances the inhibitory effect on EC
1, decreasing firing rate in continuous discharge during expiration. Wyss's observation that a different respiratory effect was induced by different stimuli frequencies of the vagal nerve can be explained by the above and following: 1) IC
1is inhibited by high frequency vagal afferent stimulation and, hence, the inhibitory effect of IC
1on the expiratory center subsides. As a result, expiration was induced by high frequency vagal stimulation. 2) EC
2is inhibited by low frequency vagal afferent stimulation and, hence, the reciprocal inhibitory effect of EC
2on IC
1disappeared. As a result, inspiration was induced by low frequency vagal stimulation.
View full abstract