The relationship between electrical resistance (ER) and salt content in pork and the effects of curing ingredients, such as nitrates, nitrites, phosphates, and sugar, on the ER of pork were investigated.
In experiments with minced pork, known amounts of salt were added to weighed samples of minced pork and mixed thoroughly with a stainless-steel spatula. The ER was determined by the Kohlrausch-bridge method. From the results, the relationship between the ER of minced pork and the amount of salt added to the pork was expressed by the following formula:
N: 0-7.4%
N=94.3/(R-10)-0.519, (15°C)
where R is the ER (in ohms) of minced pork and N the content (in per cent) of added salt in minced pork.
In experiments with intact pieces of pork, small cubes (about two centimeters cube) of pork were allowed to remain in salt solutions of various concentrations until equilibrium was obtained. ER was then determined at about a dozen different points in each piece of pork and the results were averaged. This was followed by the chemical determination of the salt content of the pork. From the values obtained, the relationship between ER and salt content was expressed by the following formula:
N: 0.356-5.90%
N=51.2/(R-10)+0.206, (14°C)
where R is the ER (in ohms) of intact pork and N the amount (in per cent) of salt penetrating pork.
Of the curing ingredients used, nitrates and nitrites had almost the same effect on the ER as an equal molecular weight of salt. The ratio of saltpeter to salt is generally 1 to 10 at the highest. The molecular weight of salt-peter is about one and a half times that of salt Therefore, it may be thought that no more than 10 per cent of the salt concentration indicated is due to the presence of saltpeter when saltpeter is present in the cured meat. To ascertain the efficiency of the electrical method, samples of cured pork were tested and subsequently analyzed.
View full abstract