Data on sex ratio in swine were obtained from the National Institute of Animal Husbandry (NI), Kagoshima Swine Experiment Station (Ks), and Tochigi Experiment Station of Animal Husbandry (To), and compared with those obtained at Takikawa (Ta) mentioned in the preceding report (1). The animals used in the present study numbered 13, 085 at NI, 4, 538 at Ks and 2, 882 at To (Ks and To: artificial insemination only). They consisted of Large White (W), Yorkshire (Y), Landrace (L), Berkshire (B), Chinese Pig (C), Poland China (P), and their hybrids (Hyb) at NI and B, L and Hyb at Ks and Y and L at To. Analysis on sex ratio was performed by the same methods as described in report (1). The results obtained are summarized as follows.
1) Total (Table 1): The sex ratio in all the groups of breed as a whole was high at NI and To. No shift in this ratio was seen at Ks. The sex ratio in each group of breed varied with the station and breed. There were no significant differences in sex ratio among four stations (Ta, NI, Ks, and To) with regard to all the groups of breed. In L and B, however, there were significant differences between Ta and Ks, Ta and NI, and Ta and Ks.
2) Boar and sow (Table 2): In some cases, the sex ratio of offspring originated from an individual boar or sow showed a shift to either sex. These individuals, however, were fewer than those at Ta. The same facts were also seen in respect to each breed. The percentage of these boars was apparently high at Ta. There were no significant differences, however, in the percentage of sows among four stations.
3) Litter series (Table 3): The sex ratio was significantly high in some orders and in some groups of order of parturition in all the groups of breed as a whole at NI and To, as well as at Ta. No significant shift was seen at Ks. The orders showing a shift in Y were more frequent than those in any other breed. Contrary to the results at Ta, B showed a shift to male in one order of parturition at NI. No shift was seen at Ks.
4) Litter size (Table 4): Results varied with station and breed in all the groups of breed as a whole and in grouping of litter size. In the present study, the class numbers of litter size which showed a shift of sex ratio to either sex were smaller than those at Ta. Therefore, only from the results of the present study, the relationship between litter size and sex ratio cannot be explained clearly.
5) Seasonal change (Table 5): The primary and secondary sex ratio varied with station both in all the groups of breed as a whole and in each group of breed. The seasonal difference in sex ratio varied also with station. There was no significant difference in the present study, as shown between B and any other group of breed at Ta. Therefore, no conclusions can be drawn on the relationship between season and sex ratio before any further studies are carried out on this subject.
6) Natural mating and artificial insemination (Table 6): In the present study, the difference in sex ratio between natural mating and artificial insemination was insignificant in all the proups of breed as a whole at NI. Such difference was significant only in the Y and Hyb groups of breed at NI.
7) Age of boar and sow (Table 7 and 8): There were some age groups showing a shift of sex ratio to male, in all the groups of breed as a whole and in each group of breed, at NI and To. There was, however, no shift of sex ratio to either sex at Ks. The number of age groups showing a shift of sex ratio was smaller in boars than in sows.
8) Annual sex ratio (Table 9): A shift of sex ratio was seen in some years at the three stations in the present study. The number of these years was smaller than those at To. In the present study, these years were only one to two at each station. A shift of sex ratio to female was seen only in one year in W at NI. It was relatively frequent in B in these years.
View full abstract